10 Comments
User's avatar
ExcessDeathsAU's avatar

Great work doc. For what it's worth, I have been keeping tabs on the MAGA-MAHA propaganda using a 'bingo card' system I made.

It is really effective to see it all laid out in one place in a visual manner. The propaganda shifts every few weeks. It is also kind of fun - things are so grim that we have to laugh or we will go insane.

Bingo card 2.0: https://substack.com/@excessdeathsau/note/c-143330219

Bingo card 1.0: https://substack.com/@excessdeathsau/note/c-141161546

Expand full comment
Pascal Bloemen's avatar

That is well written

Expand full comment
Jan DAWE's avatar

Great article, Doc. I see this sort of thing all the time. People like to put all their faith in some saviour, whether that be a religious figure or a health guru. The system is broken and has been corrupted long ago and I think it would take something major for it to change. People in high places are on a good wicket and intend to stay there regards of harms to the rest of society. what I hear a lot is "moving on now, no blame here" efficiently sweeping the last few years of tyranny under the rug. This does not bode well for the future as I see more research going into mRNA and still the push for more vaccines and more chemical medical fixes that don't work but harm. The world needs to be turned on it's head, literally. I believe there might be a magnetic pole shift in the near future. These happen at regular intervals apparently, a bit like the phases of sun activity govern earth's climate. Maybe this is the time for change on a large scale towards a better more mature humanity to thrive and slavery (yes, we are all still slaves to the system) to end.

Just might thoughts after reading your article.

Expand full comment
Carrie's avatar

Hi Ahmad, This is a blunt statement, but Jay was all in on the jabs and being on the fence now is dangerous for all. I have no respect for him. The tyranny we have faced is being prolonged with people that have the power to change the narrative. I remember that article you wrote about speaking with him at a small gathering and he totally blew you off. What an a hole he is.

Expand full comment
Doc Malik's avatar

Yup! Glad you see it 👍🏻🙏🏻❤️

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Looking at the quote you have chosen from Jay Bhattacharya in his Washington Post opinion piece I am struck by the ambiguity of it.

He says: “Still, I do not believe the mRNA vaccines caused either mass harm on the one hand or saved 14 million lives on the other. I am not here to litigate the past. I am here to chart a better path forward.”

I don't believe the mRNA vaccines caused mass harm either! As you know I have observed and written about the roll out of 5G coinciding, both geographically and chronologically, with spikes in health issues among humans and all other living things. The list of adverse reactions to the vaccines closely mirrors the list of known reactions to non-natural electro-magnetic radiation and microwaves. Therefore it is virtually impossible to differentiate between vaccine harm and EHS (Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity).

Just like Dr Bhattacharya, I do not believe that the mRNA vaccines saved 14 million lives either!

I believe they did precisely what they were designed to do: They covered up for the negative impacts on human health during the roll out of 5G. Worst still, they will continue to cover up for the future incapacitations and deaths as microwave technology continues to advance at breakneck pace.

In his capacity as director of the National Institutes of Health he is responsible for medical research and not, as he rightly states, "to litigate the past". That is someone else's job, surely?

He declares that he intends to chart a better path forward - a woolly generalisation, sure.

It doesn't exactly suggest even a clue about what he considers to be a better path.

Globally, I would like to see some cooperation between health authorities and environmentalists. I would like to see urgent studies commissioned to examine the impact of wireless telecommunications on all forms of life - from bacteria and parasites to trees and whales.

I foresee no such development in international governance because the impetus to achieve the Internet of Things under the control of Artificial Intelligence depends upon further development of microwave technology via a network of ugly towers and an intense cobweb of surveillance satellites.

So.... it really doesn't matter what the teaboys who work for the various US government departments might be saying or doing. Their system is far too compartmentalised to comprehend the 'bigger picture' and that is precisely why they are irrelevant but happily earning a small fortune for keeping up the appearance of integrity.

Expand full comment
pfarrell's avatar

As a reader considering both of these perspectives and reading both of your writings/podcasts/etc. …(Doc I’ve known of you from the very early days when you’d talk to Ritchie, the BBG)

I think the shots were poison (a poison of lack of awareness?), I have seen their direct effects in my life with those around me—baring other environmental changes—perhaps placebo effect—which even amongst more distant family members we all live in mostly rural locations, I saw no mass 5G rollout here in terms of obvious equipment being installed—not at all denying it happened, as there are also family members that didn’t roll up their sleeves who got very ill and were not PCR’d with the so-called (fake) virus and sought out completely fringe healing modalities …from that perspective a piece feels like it’s missing….

I do think we are vibrational beings of light, and what comes to mind is the life and work of Marconi as relayed by Firstenberg in his book Invisible Rainbow… just that small story in a big book speaks volumes about how frequency can work on a biological body. Now, he still thought the virology scam was thing.. but i’m

not judging.

Yet I chose to come here, on the bleeding edge of creative thought, amidst all the seeming chaos, to do The Work. I think we can control our minds and bodies to the extent that we can choose exactly how to operate in this realm. That includes instant manifestations and bi location of our “body” and levitation and walking through objects believed to be solid, and instant healing of ourselves and others, and choosing how long we want to operate here (ageless by choice)…to me, those are facts of existence, obtained by “right” thinking. I’m not the only being in existence to “think” this.

I suppose the point of the last bit is ALL is thought… literally—and our thoughts drive our being-ness. This means that every perspective is “right” on/in the Grand frame of development. Picking one/a perspective as “the” perspective is by definition missing the whole.

Thank you both for your (developing) perspectives!

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

I agree wholeheartedly with your entire paragraph about choosing to be here and our capabilities in this realm. All is thought..... literally!

Thank you very much for finding the right words to convey that mindfulness. xx

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

I took the liberty of expanding on the above comment with examples of how far away from honesty in technology our authorities have drifted. Naturally I cited your article as the source of my original concerns:

https://francesleader.substack.com/p/honesty-about-technology

Expand full comment
Stephen M's avatar

Amen to that. And yes, it's important to note what people don't say, and to focus on the evidence. Ed Dowd's analysis of US life insurance data is some of the most compelling I have seen:

https://unexpectedturns.substack.com/p/ed-dowd-smoking-guns

Expand full comment