Thank you Guy's really enjoyed we live in a mental asylum with a few inmates aware of what's going on while the rest are sleep walking All the best to you both x
This is so scary and even more so because it's happening right under our noses in plain sight. I'm not sure how people would react to this given how indoctrinated and embedded they are in the two party illusion of democracy. Those of us who began their waking moment in 2020 have endured nearly five years of low-grade anxiety in the knowledge of where these lunatics want to take us. That said, if it all went away tomorrow like a bad dream (sadly it won't) what sort of world would we be left with because so many of us have been down that many rabbit holes these past five years we no longer recognise the world as we thought we knew it. Now imagine if there was some sort of mass awakening. People would feel lost and betrayed. All faith and trust in those public bodies we thought were there to serve and protect us would be gone. There is also the issue of all the boat people coming here. Why? when AI will replace so many jobs. What is the real reason for them coming here. Are all of those barbering outlets 'sleeper' command centres and their occupants just waiting for their orders. I also listen to quite a few channels concerned with investing, economics and finance. I wonder what sort of world they are operating in because they seem to be basing their forecasts based on historical data, charts, cycles etc. I think we are beyond that. I never hear them discussing global finance whilst referrencing The Great Reset, 4th Ind Rev, WEF or The Great Taking.
If Xi JInping is a member of the WEF and the WEF is working towards Stakeholder Capitalism through Agenda 2030, why is it that China is not subscribed to the climate change/sustainability components of this agenda? All those new fossil fuel power stations? The proliferation of cheap, throwaway tat being sold to Western populations etc. China appears to be going in the completely opposite direction. Could it be that this is because China has been given a "free pass" on this? And if so, why would that be?
Could it be that:
(i) They know that man-made impact on climate change is much smaller than they make it out to be and not the existential risk that their narrative portrays
(ii) That because China has already undergone its cultural revolution, with ultimate control of its population, they don’t need China to use the “measures" dictated by these narratives
(iii) That these “measures” are merely tools designed to force Western populations into a system of ultimate compliance/subservience similar to what China has already achieved
OK, I totally agree that we need to be 'forewarned and forearmed'. But if this is about trying to get wide publicity and wake others up, we need to be aware that the message can and does come through as 'We're all fracked. The plan is in place and there's not much we can do'. Those who haven't bought in at all until now, are hardly likely to be attracted to that message? So I think there are maybe a couple of things that we need to focus on. Firstly, do we actually think that those trying to implement stakeholder capitalism are so much brighter than us that they can achieve it simply by deception? I want to be aware, but I refuse to believe that these people, who are sociopaths who think they can walk on water, are more intelligent than we are, and won't make the most monumental mistakes in trying to implement their plan. But secondly, and perhaps more importantly, the assumption is that this can be put into place without passing through several quite long interim stages. For example, on Net Zero, long before we get to 2030, the shortages of power and critical materials like plastic, to say nothing of meat and food, will hit the population like a sledgehammer, and the project will come to a crashing halt. You can't jump to Net Zero without passing through those interim stages. So I think the message needs to be miles more positive. I'm still glad you did this pod, Ahmad, thanks. And one last point - the more people we call 'controlled opposition', the weaker and more divided we become. We need to be very wary about this - those driving this will be thrilled if we attack each other, rather than them. Sorry, rather a long message.
What an important chat. Needs to be shared far and wide as it answers the “but why would they do that” question that normies ask. Well done Richard for all your hard work and for Doc for widening his audience
Many thanks Ahmad for this podcast. Great to hear from Richard Jeffs. I agree that this is among the most important issues.
In case it's useful to anyone, not least in sharing with others, I put together this series of posts, which are essentially a written/illustrated version of Richard's film Stakeholder Communism:
Thank you Guy's really enjoyed we live in a mental asylum with a few inmates aware of what's going on while the rest are sleep walking All the best to you both x
This is so scary and even more so because it's happening right under our noses in plain sight. I'm not sure how people would react to this given how indoctrinated and embedded they are in the two party illusion of democracy. Those of us who began their waking moment in 2020 have endured nearly five years of low-grade anxiety in the knowledge of where these lunatics want to take us. That said, if it all went away tomorrow like a bad dream (sadly it won't) what sort of world would we be left with because so many of us have been down that many rabbit holes these past five years we no longer recognise the world as we thought we knew it. Now imagine if there was some sort of mass awakening. People would feel lost and betrayed. All faith and trust in those public bodies we thought were there to serve and protect us would be gone. There is also the issue of all the boat people coming here. Why? when AI will replace so many jobs. What is the real reason for them coming here. Are all of those barbering outlets 'sleeper' command centres and their occupants just waiting for their orders. I also listen to quite a few channels concerned with investing, economics and finance. I wonder what sort of world they are operating in because they seem to be basing their forecasts based on historical data, charts, cycles etc. I think we are beyond that. I never hear them discussing global finance whilst referrencing The Great Reset, 4th Ind Rev, WEF or The Great Taking.
If Xi JInping is a member of the WEF and the WEF is working towards Stakeholder Capitalism through Agenda 2030, why is it that China is not subscribed to the climate change/sustainability components of this agenda? All those new fossil fuel power stations? The proliferation of cheap, throwaway tat being sold to Western populations etc. China appears to be going in the completely opposite direction. Could it be that this is because China has been given a "free pass" on this? And if so, why would that be?
Could it be that:
(i) They know that man-made impact on climate change is much smaller than they make it out to be and not the existential risk that their narrative portrays
(ii) That because China has already undergone its cultural revolution, with ultimate control of its population, they don’t need China to use the “measures" dictated by these narratives
(iii) That these “measures” are merely tools designed to force Western populations into a system of ultimate compliance/subservience similar to what China has already achieved
Thoughts?
OK, I totally agree that we need to be 'forewarned and forearmed'. But if this is about trying to get wide publicity and wake others up, we need to be aware that the message can and does come through as 'We're all fracked. The plan is in place and there's not much we can do'. Those who haven't bought in at all until now, are hardly likely to be attracted to that message? So I think there are maybe a couple of things that we need to focus on. Firstly, do we actually think that those trying to implement stakeholder capitalism are so much brighter than us that they can achieve it simply by deception? I want to be aware, but I refuse to believe that these people, who are sociopaths who think they can walk on water, are more intelligent than we are, and won't make the most monumental mistakes in trying to implement their plan. But secondly, and perhaps more importantly, the assumption is that this can be put into place without passing through several quite long interim stages. For example, on Net Zero, long before we get to 2030, the shortages of power and critical materials like plastic, to say nothing of meat and food, will hit the population like a sledgehammer, and the project will come to a crashing halt. You can't jump to Net Zero without passing through those interim stages. So I think the message needs to be miles more positive. I'm still glad you did this pod, Ahmad, thanks. And one last point - the more people we call 'controlled opposition', the weaker and more divided we become. We need to be very wary about this - those driving this will be thrilled if we attack each other, rather than them. Sorry, rather a long message.
What an important chat. Needs to be shared far and wide as it answers the “but why would they do that” question that normies ask. Well done Richard for all your hard work and for Doc for widening his audience
Visit Richard Jeffs' website at yellow.forum for more (rather scary) essential reading!!
Fear is the weapon of the enemy. It should not be our weapon.
Yeah, I really enjoyed this one, very important that everybody should know about this stuff.
Many thanks Ahmad for this podcast. Great to hear from Richard Jeffs. I agree that this is among the most important issues.
In case it's useful to anyone, not least in sharing with others, I put together this series of posts, which are essentially a written/illustrated version of Richard's film Stakeholder Communism:
https://unexpectedturns.substack.com/p/stakeholder-communism-part-1-of-4