I have a couple visiting with a one-yr-old, who are staying in my garaj mahal. The dad was delighted at the size of the bed, big enough for all of them without getting kicked in the .... I pointed out that it was two singles put together with one mattress because we had tried to follow the rule book and get our girls to sleep on their own. It was torture! We finally put the beds together and I would sleep with one on each side and the youngest on top of me ;-)
At some point the littlest realized there was a perfectly good parent going to waste, and she and her dad migrated to a different bed. And often, when we finally managed to sleep in our own bed, there would be little feet pattering down the hall to crawl in.
When the oldest was a newborn, I tried that three-night plan where you let them cry. I was sobbing outside her door. I may have lasted the same half-hour as you. She's now 32 and still prefers to sleep in the same bed, if I'm visiting and her husband's away. She's going to be a great mom, who likes to sleep like a big pile of puppies.
Hmm, interesting. (Sometimes perhaps slightly beyond interesting ... not sure about the acronyms and stuff ... the word 'media' is from Latin medius, meaning “middle”, while 'me' and 'die' are via Proto-Germanic language, so I'm guessing that this is a coincidence). But a great guest, and we really need to know as much as possible about why so many people have recently simply been doing what they were told.
I have to say that from my view point, shaming people for drinking coffee and deliberately making them feel uncomfortable about the free choices they decide to make just feels very similar to the tactics governments and media used to try and persuade people to lockdown, wear masks and take vaccines. Isn't it just easier to just express an opinion that coffee is not good for you, then maybe provide some evidence and then let people use their own free will to make their own decision? Why is there a need to pressurise and guilt people? That feels a bit too much like collectivism for my liking!
He does talk a lot about coffee and provides evidence, in other podcasts. He used to drink himself and sees how much push there is for us to drink it. My husband doesn't like listening to him talk about coffee because he enjoys his morning coffee so much, I drink it but I know what it does to me, I have breaks from it sometimes.
Yeah, for me it isn't about whether something is good or bad. It is about Christoff telling other people that if they don't live as he says they should live, well, then according to him, you no longer have free will. Indeed, if you don't live the way Christoff advocates then he says that you are just living under mind control. It is something which I think just fundamentally goes against allowing people to live freely. Christoff even admitted that he wants to replace the current cult like system with another cult. Only he thinks his cult like system will be much better. However, isn't that what every wannabe cult leader thinks?
The other thing that I find so similar with Christoff and all the doctors who tried to push the vax onto billions of people, is how many times he likes to declare himself as an expert. I am always ill at ease with people who like to constantly tell others how expert they are. Why not let us make up our own minds about that!?
I know what you mean. My husband is still complaining about him after watching it earlier! I think he talks that way because he runs courses on mind control and speaks the same way when he's doing a podcast, which is a bit different. I just filter out bits, I know I feel better when I don't drink coffee and it makes me less in control of my responses but right now it's something I am having and I'll just ignore him.
I always enjoy listening to Jason. I've tried to find - the secrets of our ancient past, does anyone have a link please? Editing to say I found one by Mark Passio, which looks interesting - https://youtu.be/eaPecokz5us
As a psychotherapist now working outside of 'the system' I was appalled by the advice you were given by the 'sleep nurse' - what other animals would leave their newly born infants to cry alone for an entire night? Leaving the baby to cry like that, yes they will eventually quieten down, but not because they are calm, but because they have gone into a traumatised freeze state/collapse. Thank goodness you trusted your paternal instincts to care for your daughter she needed. If you are interested Irene Lyon - an expert in nervous system regulation and healing trauma - has much to say on this subject - it would be great to have her or her husband Seth on your podcast - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_ZrlZ1lkAs&list=PL_tIcR-r0CU7ILnciQbAUULSBimkIMDHn&index=17
He's right...coffee, alcohol and sugar are the things I stop when I get serious about losing weight and stabilising my energy. I do energy work and those things do mess it about and destabilise us emotionally. You can't really be you when something else is influencing how you feel and react...same goes for past trauma.
I'm listening to Richard Willett on Ikonic now and he is saying some very interesting things about 9/11 too.
I still haven't finished watching but have more thoughts I want to jot down on Jason. He's given me the first argument that made sense that this is an attack on whites. I've had others I respect who say that, but it's the first time I've looked at it as a differentiation between the ruling class, who are white, and the servant and slave classes.
Jason doesn't say who that ruling class is, I suspect because of the prohibition against the word Jew. But that word wasn't coined until the 18th c. Some use Yahwists. I have one article called YahChoPeeps--Yahweh's Chosen People. Who that is has changed over time. What hasn't changed is the dynasty that wrote the myth of Yahweh and developed the mind control techniques--including the techniques to manipulate the manipulators.
Many of my articles have analyzed the Torah/ OT and looked at the twisting of words into their opposite meaning. I have one reader named Rhonda who is an anagram fanatic, who showed the hidden sinister meaning in the names once they were unscrambled. We've delved deep into the languages. Did you know Latin is a synthetic language with no indigenous mother tongue? It's abbreviated for accountants and lawyers--the ruling class.
So I would say Jason's work is incredible, but then I'd be telling you not to believe it. I would say it's amazing, and will lead you into a maze. Maybe it's stupendous and will stupefy you. It could be stunning and make you unconscious. Does it make its point and drive it into you? Does it strike you as true? It's certainly fascinating, same root as fascist, which is a tied bundle of sticks, the better to hit you with.
There's so much hidden violence in our language. Intentionally so. Really learning a lot from Jason, and from you, my friend.
Ah, so he's looking for the source. Ancient Egypt was infiltrated by the Hyksos, which means foreign rulers. They were the powers behind the throne, introducing taxation and destroying the sovereign farmers with debt--as is paralleled in the Biblical story of Joseph taking the seed grain (the pyramids have been called the Pharaoh's siloes) until famine struck and they had to give him their land, their livestock, their wives and children. And Joseph brags that until this day, they still owe the Pharaoh a fifth of their harvest.
They also promoted the cult of Set, the psychopathic god that became Yahweh. As Laurent Guyenot also notes, Set becomes Seth in Genesis and inherits the right to rule the world and women, natch.
In the Amarna letters, stone tablets sent to the Pharaohs, the vassal lords complain that Abdi-Ashirta, represented as a jackal, is laying siege to their towns using the nomadic Habiru--the earliest version of Hebrew. Only when the people turn on their mayors and kill them does he promise to release them. So he uses trickery to get people to turn against their leaders.
Abdi-Ashirta becomes Abram in the Bible. The Hyksos may have been the Royal Scythes, which is who Constantine was when this lineage got transferred into being popes.
Here are some of my episodes that talk about it. Thanks for responding, Jennifer, and post a link to Jason's podcasts on it, if you have them handy:
Should be a discussion immediately sent out to all and the youth especially. My thanks.
I have a couple visiting with a one-yr-old, who are staying in my garaj mahal. The dad was delighted at the size of the bed, big enough for all of them without getting kicked in the .... I pointed out that it was two singles put together with one mattress because we had tried to follow the rule book and get our girls to sleep on their own. It was torture! We finally put the beds together and I would sleep with one on each side and the youngest on top of me ;-)
At some point the littlest realized there was a perfectly good parent going to waste, and she and her dad migrated to a different bed. And often, when we finally managed to sleep in our own bed, there would be little feet pattering down the hall to crawl in.
When the oldest was a newborn, I tried that three-night plan where you let them cry. I was sobbing outside her door. I may have lasted the same half-hour as you. She's now 32 and still prefers to sleep in the same bed, if I'm visiting and her husband's away. She's going to be a great mom, who likes to sleep like a big pile of puppies.
More later when I've listened to the rest.
Hmm, interesting. (Sometimes perhaps slightly beyond interesting ... not sure about the acronyms and stuff ... the word 'media' is from Latin medius, meaning “middle”, while 'me' and 'die' are via Proto-Germanic language, so I'm guessing that this is a coincidence). But a great guest, and we really need to know as much as possible about why so many people have recently simply been doing what they were told.
I really enjoyed this. It stretched my perspective somewhat.
I love listening to minds that function differently to mine.
I love to live by the motto
'Every day's a school day's
But not in state education, like 😂
I have to say that from my view point, shaming people for drinking coffee and deliberately making them feel uncomfortable about the free choices they decide to make just feels very similar to the tactics governments and media used to try and persuade people to lockdown, wear masks and take vaccines. Isn't it just easier to just express an opinion that coffee is not good for you, then maybe provide some evidence and then let people use their own free will to make their own decision? Why is there a need to pressurise and guilt people? That feels a bit too much like collectivism for my liking!
He does talk a lot about coffee and provides evidence, in other podcasts. He used to drink himself and sees how much push there is for us to drink it. My husband doesn't like listening to him talk about coffee because he enjoys his morning coffee so much, I drink it but I know what it does to me, I have breaks from it sometimes.
Thanks for responding :)
Yeah, for me it isn't about whether something is good or bad. It is about Christoff telling other people that if they don't live as he says they should live, well, then according to him, you no longer have free will. Indeed, if you don't live the way Christoff advocates then he says that you are just living under mind control. It is something which I think just fundamentally goes against allowing people to live freely. Christoff even admitted that he wants to replace the current cult like system with another cult. Only he thinks his cult like system will be much better. However, isn't that what every wannabe cult leader thinks?
The other thing that I find so similar with Christoff and all the doctors who tried to push the vax onto billions of people, is how many times he likes to declare himself as an expert. I am always ill at ease with people who like to constantly tell others how expert they are. Why not let us make up our own minds about that!?
I know what you mean. My husband is still complaining about him after watching it earlier! I think he talks that way because he runs courses on mind control and speaks the same way when he's doing a podcast, which is a bit different. I just filter out bits, I know I feel better when I don't drink coffee and it makes me less in control of my responses but right now it's something I am having and I'll just ignore him.
I always enjoy listening to Jason. I've tried to find - the secrets of our ancient past, does anyone have a link please? Editing to say I found one by Mark Passio, which looks interesting - https://youtu.be/eaPecokz5us
Wow! Thanks
As a psychotherapist now working outside of 'the system' I was appalled by the advice you were given by the 'sleep nurse' - what other animals would leave their newly born infants to cry alone for an entire night? Leaving the baby to cry like that, yes they will eventually quieten down, but not because they are calm, but because they have gone into a traumatised freeze state/collapse. Thank goodness you trusted your paternal instincts to care for your daughter she needed. If you are interested Irene Lyon - an expert in nervous system regulation and healing trauma - has much to say on this subject - it would be great to have her or her husband Seth on your podcast - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_ZrlZ1lkAs&list=PL_tIcR-r0CU7ILnciQbAUULSBimkIMDHn&index=17
Wow what an amazing listen, I need to listen to it again as this one has so much important info and lessons to learn!!
He's right...coffee, alcohol and sugar are the things I stop when I get serious about losing weight and stabilising my energy. I do energy work and those things do mess it about and destabilise us emotionally. You can't really be you when something else is influencing how you feel and react...same goes for past trauma.
I'm listening to Richard Willett on Ikonic now and he is saying some very interesting things about 9/11 too.
I still haven't finished watching but have more thoughts I want to jot down on Jason. He's given me the first argument that made sense that this is an attack on whites. I've had others I respect who say that, but it's the first time I've looked at it as a differentiation between the ruling class, who are white, and the servant and slave classes.
Jason doesn't say who that ruling class is, I suspect because of the prohibition against the word Jew. But that word wasn't coined until the 18th c. Some use Yahwists. I have one article called YahChoPeeps--Yahweh's Chosen People. Who that is has changed over time. What hasn't changed is the dynasty that wrote the myth of Yahweh and developed the mind control techniques--including the techniques to manipulate the manipulators.
Many of my articles have analyzed the Torah/ OT and looked at the twisting of words into their opposite meaning. I have one reader named Rhonda who is an anagram fanatic, who showed the hidden sinister meaning in the names once they were unscrambled. We've delved deep into the languages. Did you know Latin is a synthetic language with no indigenous mother tongue? It's abbreviated for accountants and lawyers--the ruling class.
So I would say Jason's work is incredible, but then I'd be telling you not to believe it. I would say it's amazing, and will lead you into a maze. Maybe it's stupendous and will stupefy you. It could be stunning and make you unconscious. Does it make its point and drive it into you? Does it strike you as true? It's certainly fascinating, same root as fascist, which is a tied bundle of sticks, the better to hit you with.
There's so much hidden violence in our language. Intentionally so. Really learning a lot from Jason, and from you, my friend.
Jason talks about the ancient Egyptians and the English Royal Family, in other podcasts.
Ah, so he's looking for the source. Ancient Egypt was infiltrated by the Hyksos, which means foreign rulers. They were the powers behind the throne, introducing taxation and destroying the sovereign farmers with debt--as is paralleled in the Biblical story of Joseph taking the seed grain (the pyramids have been called the Pharaoh's siloes) until famine struck and they had to give him their land, their livestock, their wives and children. And Joseph brags that until this day, they still owe the Pharaoh a fifth of their harvest.
They also promoted the cult of Set, the psychopathic god that became Yahweh. As Laurent Guyenot also notes, Set becomes Seth in Genesis and inherits the right to rule the world and women, natch.
In the Amarna letters, stone tablets sent to the Pharaohs, the vassal lords complain that Abdi-Ashirta, represented as a jackal, is laying siege to their towns using the nomadic Habiru--the earliest version of Hebrew. Only when the people turn on their mayors and kill them does he promise to release them. So he uses trickery to get people to turn against their leaders.
Abdi-Ashirta becomes Abram in the Bible. The Hyksos may have been the Royal Scythes, which is who Constantine was when this lineage got transferred into being popes.
Here are some of my episodes that talk about it. Thanks for responding, Jennifer, and post a link to Jason's podcasts on it, if you have them handy:
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/from-yahweh-to-zion
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-master-baiters
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/yahchopeeps
https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/the-myth-of-ad